Antwort: Re: unknown symbols using rtai_serial/gcc 3.x and embeddedx86 boards
Dipl. Ing. (FH) Malte Witt
malte.witt at sieb-meyer.de
Thu Dec 16 15:36:26 CET 2004
Hi Taco,
as I had to learn during my first experiments with RTAI - gcc 2.95.3 is
still the official recommended compiler for kernel code. Some versions of
gcc 3.xx (actually most of them) are known to work well with kernel code
and therefore with RTAI kernel modules. I did do some experiments with 3.x
compilers and it worked well (I had a short look, but short-term I
couldn't find the exact version). Nevertheless I go with 2.95.3. Others
might think different on this - but I do not need features of newer
versions in bare kernel code. It's better to know that the compiler is
prooven to work well in many circumstances for me.
For all my lxrt-userspace stuff (which is most of my work) I use 3.3.3
SuSE compilers though.
Regards,
Malte
--
SIEB & MEYER AG
Sonder-CNC / Dipl. Ing. (FH) Malte Witt
Auf dem Schmaarkamp 21
21339 Lueneburg
Germany
Tel.: +49-4131-203 1618
Fax.: +49-4131-38562
E-mail: development(_at_)sieb-meyer.de
www.sieb-meyer.de
Taco Walstra <walstra at science.uva.nl>
Gesendet von: rtai-admin at rtai.org
16.12.2004 15:07
Bitte antworten an
walstra at science.uva.nl
An
rtai at rtai.org
Kopie
Thema
Re: unknown symbols using rtai_serial/gcc 3.x and embeddedx86 boards
On Thursday 16 December 2004 11:56, Dipl. Ing. (FH) Malte Witt wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> I am not sure if this will help you, but you should NOT use a "SuSE
3.3.3
> gcc" compiler. I had random lockups and several side effects with my
> project to when I tired SuSE compilers. They are somewhat different from
> main gcc. I "downgraded" the compilers to suggested 2.95.3 from gnu.org.
I
> would give it a try. I can just advise you not to use SuSE compilers for
> kernel code.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Malte
> --
Hi, this is perhaps an explanation why I didn't succeed in getting the
latest
rtai to run on a PC with suse. I moved to older rtai versions with older
kernel versions to get everything running on a different Pc, which didn't
give any problems, so I could test some different stuff.
Does the gcc 3.x downloaded from gnu.org also give problems?
I also want to ask if somebody has experience with getting rtai to run
with a
patched 2.4 or 2.6 kernel on a ts 5400 pentium board by technologic
systems.
This board or another type of their cheapo boards (www.embeddedx86.com).
Thanks,
Taco Walstra
--
-----------------------------------------
drs. Taco Walstra
University of Amsterdam
Faculty of Science
Valckenierstraat 65
1018 XE Amsterdam
Netherlands
0031-20-525 5730
_______________________________________________
RTAI mailing list
RTAI at rtai.org
https://mail.rtai.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rtai
More information about the Rtai
mailing list