Increasing MAX_SLOTS on RTAI 3.0
mantegazza at aero.polimi.it
Wed Jun 22 14:32:53 CEST 2005
Peter Soetens wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 June 2005 13:45, Paolo Mantegazza wrote:
>>Malte experience is OK. The problems reported by Peter, in a following
>>message, are likey due to registering names not univocally assigned by
>>the user, but relying on something generated by RTAI when using a zero id.
> Interesting. This is what we do and I thought this was the safest way. How
> should an application then find new names when creating say, 5000+
> semaphores ? Generating the names yourselves in a 'reserved' namespace ? I
> believe Takis would be interested in this topic too, since he's the one who
> actually stress-tested RTAI within this regard (or did I miss an earlier
> thread on this list ? )
It is safe if you use just that, none can garantte there is no name
conflict if both users and internal namings are used.
The reservation of different reserved named spaces within an application
is not a complex problem, xrtailab has one. The real problem is the
constraint to use just 6 characters that limis the ease of the scheme we
are using. So it will be solved, as I'm being bitten by it too, along
the line of my email.
More information about the Rtai