Increasing MAX_SLOTS on RTAI 3.0

[henrique at jpl.nasa.gov]

You're right!  The names are a 6 digit, base 39 number which means 39^6 = 
3.519e9.  Looks like I was chasing a red herring.

Thanks,
         David


At 06:40 AM 6/23/2005, Panagiotis Issaris wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Op do, 23-06-2005 te 08:17 +0200, schreef Malte Witt:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > I looked at nam2num() and it seems that it will generate 378 unique
> > names
> > > (i.e. 6*(26*2+10+1) objects) and therefore the nam2num() could at most
> > be
> > Actually I cannot follow you here ...
> > Wouldn't it be (26*2+10+1)^6 possible unique names? Which is 3.519e9
> > names. I think this is enough for a 10k regitry ...
>Indeed, I have been using RTAI Classic with 10K registry for a
>considerable amount of time now.
>
>With friendly regards,
>Takis
>