Archive of user RTAI additions?
mantegazza at aero.polimi.it
Fri Jan 20 10:15:29 CET 2006
Stienen, A.H.A. (CTW) wrote:
> I see your 'easy to maintain' point, but perhaps we can add the
> 'requirement' of a minimal amount of documentation in the comments of
> the S-function. For instance, for each of the following subject a couple
> of lines:
> - Short summary
> - Version, authors(s)
> - Installation (compiling, lines to add to .mdl files, etc.)
> - How to use
I think it's OK. Somebody we'll care of checking for a minimal doc like
> Paolo Mantegazza wrote:
>> Marco Romagnoli wrote:
>>> It could be really useful to have a standard format for all
>>> S-functions and add-on!
>>> Good idea! In particular for the documentation in order to avoid
>>> consuming time to understand where information is and imediately
>>> start using it.
>> My idea was to have a text file for each Sfun and a README index for
>> the related site download directory. Not much sofisticated but simple
>> to maintain.
More information about the Rtai