rtai/fusion and qnx

Dario ddario at tiscalinet.it
Thu Oct 21 15:23:41 CEST 2004

So I should provide a new implementation of native QNX functions which are 
not POSIX.
According with "rtai-fusion" style, this means to design an "ad-hoc" qnx 
skin, or am I wrong?


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paolo Mantegazza" <mantegazza at aero.polimi.it>
To: "Gilles Chanteperdrix" <gilles.chanteperdrix at laposte.net>
Cc: "Dario" <ddario at tiscalinet.it>; <rtai at rtai.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 4:11 PM
Subject: Re: rtai/fusion and qnx

> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Dario wrote:
>>  > Dear RTAI developers,
>>  > > Taking a look to rtai/fusion website I've seen that there are skins 
>> for some > RTOSs but qnx.
>>  > Is there an available skin which can be used also with qnx 
>> applications?
>>  > Otherwise, are there some developers who are working on a qnx skin?
>> QNX interface is POSIX, if I am not wrong. So that you can use the POSIX
>> skin.
> Well there might be people that like true native QNX functions and style, 
> the core of QNX is still message direct intertask message passing I guess. 
> Posix could be just APIs wrappers not the core system.
> Paolo.

More information about the Rtai mailing list